ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients suffering from systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) display poor antibody development after two doses of mRNA vaccinations leaving these patients with only limited humoral protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 disease courses. Of key interest is the effect of conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological/ targeted drugs (b/tsDMARDs) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on the time of protection.ObjectivesTo compare antibody titer development in patients with vasculitis and connective tissue disease (CTD) with healthy controls 6 months after two mRNA vaccinations and after third immunization. To analyze factors, that affect the velocity of titer decline, well as qualitative humoral response.MethodsPatients with SARD were enrolled and matched for gender and age with healthy control subjects (HC) and the humoral response after 6 months to two doses of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in terms of SARS-COV-2 antibody titer was assessed. In addition to binding antibody units (BAU) we also analyzed neutralizing antibodies. Patients receiving B-cell depleting therapy and those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (via detection of nucleocapsid antibodies) were excluded. Differences between two groups were calculated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsA total of 53 patients with SARD (42 patients suffering from connective tissue disease and 11 with vasculitis respectively) and 73 HC were analysed. Interestingly only patients receiving a combination therapy of different csDMARDs/ b/tsDMARDs demonstrated diminished antibody titers 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccine (p-value p-value<0,001), whereas patients receiving only csDMARD as monotherapy displayed comparable antibody levels to healthy controls. This effect was equalized after a third booster vaccination (p-value=0,13). Concerning disease entities, patients with vasculitis seemed to have lower BAU than HC (p-value<0,05) and patients suffering from CTD. After third vaccination both patient groups had lower antibody levels than HC (vasculitis: p-value <0,0001;CTD: p-value p-value<0,01). Lower antibody levels before third vaccination correlated with lower antibodies after third immunization.ConclusionPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing combination therapy may be more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, due to reduced antibody levels 6 months following two doses of mRNA vaccine. Our data strongly recommends antibody measurements in patients receiving combination therapy and individualized earlier booster vaccination.Figure 1.Anti-SARS-Cov-2 S antibody titers. A: Antibody titers measured 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccination in patients with connective tissue disease, vasculitis and healthy controls. B, Antibody levels according to disease entity. AB: antibody;BAU: binding antibody unit;CTD: connective tissue disease;HC: healthy control;mono: disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug monotherapy;combination: combination therapy of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs;RBD: receptor binding domain;[Figure omitted. See PDF]Table 1.Demographic parameters and therapy of study participants.SARD (n=53)HC (n=73)Age, mean (standard deviation)53.55 (±14.04)51.27 (±14.07)Female45 (84.9%)47 (64.4%)Connective tissue disease42 (79%)Vasculitis11 (21%)csDMARD or b/tsDMARD monotherapy22 (41%)csDMARD and/or b/tsDMARD combination therapy13 (25%)No therapy18 (34%)Methotrexate8 (15%)Mycophenolate mofetil10 (19%)Hydroxychloroquine17 (32%)Azathioprine8 (15%)Belimumab3 (6%)Tocilizumab3 (6%)Glucocorticoid dose 1. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.8 (±10.8)Glucocorticoid dose 2. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.6 (±10.7)SARD: Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, HC: Healthy controls, csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and b/tsDMARD: biological/ targeted drugs disease modifying antirheumatic drugsREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsElisabeth Simader Speakers bureau: Lilly, Thomas Deimel: None declared, Felix Kartnig: None declared, Selma Tobudic: None declared, Helmuth Hasla her Grant/research support from: Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis, Thomas Maria Karonitsch: None declared, Daniel Mrak: None declared, Thomas Nothnagl: None declared, Thomas Perkmann: None declared, Helga Lechner-Radner: None declared, Judith Sautner: None declared, Florian Winkler: None declared, Heinz Burgmann Speakers bureau: speaker fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, Paid instructor for: advisory boards for Valneva, MSD, Gilead, Consultant of: consulting fees from MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: other from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, Stefan Winkler: None declared, Stephan Blüml Speakers bureau: personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Novartis, Peter Mandl Speakers bureau: reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, Grant/research support from: research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundAnti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis (MDA5-DM) is characterized by high mortality due to rapid progressive ILD. MDA5 is a cytosolic protein and a family of RIG-I like receptor, which functions as a virus RNA sensor and induces the production of such as type-1 IFN. Although little is known about the pathogenesis of MDA5-DM, it is notable that the similarities were reported between COVID-19 infection and MDA5-DM. It may suggest that there is a common underlying autoinflammatory mechanism. We reported that in MDA5-DM, (1) RIG-I-like receptor signaling is enhanced and (2) antiviral responses such as type 1 IFN signaling are also enhanced as compare with anti-ARS-antibody positive DM, and (3) the key for survival is suppression of RIG-I-like and IFN signaling (EULAR2022, POS0390). We also found that a significant role for uncontrolled macrophage in the pathogenesis of ILD by our autopsy case. Recently, it has been reported that tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclophosphamide (CY) combination therapy (TC-Tx) has improved the prognosis of cases with early onset of the disease, but there are cases that cannot be saved. Therefore, we devised BRT therapy (BRT-Tx). The Tx combines baricitinib (BAR), which inhibits GM-CSF and IFN-mediated signaling and effectively suppresses uncontrolled macrophages, with rituximab (RTX) and TAC, which rapidly inhibits B and T cell interaction and ultimately prevents anti-MDA5 antibody production.ObjectivesTo determine the differences in gene expression between BRT and TC-Tx for MDA5-DM in peripheral blood.MethodsTotal of 6 MDA5-DM (TC: 3, BRT: 3) were included and all of them had multiple poor prognostic factors. Peripheral whole blood was collected at just before and 2-3 months after the treatment. RNA was extracted, and quantified using a next-generation sequencer. Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) were identified by pre vs. post treatment. Gene Ontology (GO), clustering and Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) were performed to DEGs. As one BRT case was added since our last year's report, we also reanalyzed the surviving vs. fatal cases. The IFN signature was scored separately for Types 1, 2, and 3, and the changes between pre- and post-treatment were investigated.ResultsTwo of three cases with TC died during treatment, while all three cases on BRT recovered. The cluster analysis of the DEGs separated deaths from survivors, not by type of treatment. Comparing surviving and dead cases, GO analysis revealed that the immune system via immunoglobulins and B cells was significantly suppressed in surviving cases. GO analysis of DEGs in each therapeutic group showed that expression of B cell-related genes such as lymphocyte proliferation and B cell receptor signaling pathway were significantly suppressed in BRT-Tx. On the other hand, TC-Tx significantly suppressed such pathways as cell proliferation and cell surface receptor signaling, and was less specific for the target cells than BRT-Tx. The changes in IFN signature score after treatment showed an increase in type 2 and 3 IFN scores in all fatal cases and an increase in type 1 IFN score in one fatal case.ConclusionBRT-Tx significantly suppressed gene expression associated with B cells, while TC-Tx was characterized by low specificity of therapeutic targets and suppression of total cell proliferation. Comparison of surviving and dead cases revealed that the combination of RTX contributed to the success of treatment, as suppression of the immune system mediated by immunoglobulins and B cells is the key for survival. Analysis of the IFN signature revealed an increase in IFN score after treatment in fatal cases, indicating that the combination of BAR is beneficial. The superiority of BRT-Tx seems clear from the fact that all patients survived with BRT-Tx while only one/three patients survived with TC-Tx.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsMoe Sakamoto: None declared, Yu Nakai: None declared, Yoshiharu Sato: None declared, Yoshinobu Koyama Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Asahikasei, Ayumi, BMS, Esai, Eli-Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, GSK.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundRheumatologic patients treated with Rituximab (RTX) are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 and death. The B-cell depletive treatment significantly affects B cell functions involved in anti-SARS-CoV-2 response, leading to relevant impacts on the clinical and serological course of infection, long-term immunity, and vaccine responses. In light of these observations, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of COVID-19 with Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) was recently approved in Italy for all patients treated with RTX in the previous year, independently of their serological status against SARS-CoV-2.ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TGM/CGM in a single-centre cohort of rheumatologic patients treated with RTX.MethodsFrom October 2022, all patients who had been treated with RTX in the previous 12 months and who underwent clinical assessment at our rheumatologic tertiary centre were screened for eligibility to PrEP of COVID-19 with TGM/CGM. According to the indications of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), we excluded subjects with major cardiovascular risk factors and/or coagulation abnormalities;those who reported a previous allergic reaction to any anti-COVID19 vaccine were referred to an allergologist for an evaluation before TGM/CGM administration. Patients who agreed to be treated with TGM/CGM signed an informed consent. Clinical and demographic features were collected at baseline, and follow-up phone assessment was performed the day after and 1 month after TGM/CGM administration, to assess treatment tolerability and new COVID-19- related events. A descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsFrom 1 October 2022 to 31 December 2022, 90 subjects were screened for eligibility to TGM/CGM. Among them, 11 were excluded for contraindications due to comorbidities and 55 refused TGM/CGM administration. Among patients who agreed to receive PrEP of COVID-19, 21 received TGM/CGM before 31 December 2022 and 3 were scheduled for January2023. Patients treated with TGM/CGM had a mean age of 54 years (standard deviation: 17) and 19 (90.5%) were female;9 were affected by rheumatoid arthritis and 12 by other rheumatologic diseases (3 systemic lupus erythematosus, 2 systemic sclerosis, 1 Sjögren syndrome, 1 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 3 anti-synthetase syndrome, 2 vasculitides). Most of them had completed the vaccination schedule against COVID-19 (19, 90.5%) and 9 (42.8%) reported an infectious event by SARS-CoV-2 in the previous year. One month after TGM/CGM administration, no patient reported adverse events related to TGM/CGM nor COVID-19 related symptoms.ConclusionPrEP of COVID-19 with TGM/CGM was well tolerated in our population of rheumatologic patients treated with RTX in the previous year and no COVID-19 related symptoms were observed in the month of follow-up after TGM/CGM administration. Future observations may provide further data on long-term efficacy of TGM/CGM in preventing COVID-19.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsMaria Manara Speakers bureau: Novartis, Angelini, Consultant of: Lilly, MSD, Manuel Sette: None declared, Laura Giudice: None declared, Martina Biggioggero: None declared, Nicoletta Del Papa Speakers bureau: Janssen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Actelion, Ennio Giulio Favalli Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Maria Gerosa: None declared, Francesca Ingegnoli: None declared, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Fresenius, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundBelimumab (BLM) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-lymphocyte stimulating factor (BlyS) approved as a specific treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2011. We present the experience with BLM in a Spanish cohort with more than 460 patients.ObjectivesTo describe demographic characteristics, efficacy and safety of BLM in patients with SLE in Spanish population since its approval.MethodsDescriptive, retrospective, multicenter study in patients diagnosed with SLE according to EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC and/or ACR 1997 diagnostic criteria. Data regarding SLE patients treated with BLM were collected from medical records (2011-2022). Demographic features, efficacy, laboratory variables, SLEDAI, renal involvement, steroid dose, administration routes and safety were assessed. To see whether a trend in BLM prescription had changed or not over time, two periods of time were analyzed: 2011-2016 (period1) and 2017-2022 (period2).ResultsBaseline characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1.A total of 462 patients (36 hospitals) were included, 50.9% were on intravenous (IV), 34% on subcutaneous (SC) and 15.1% switched from IV to SC route. The median number of pre-BLM csDMARD use was 2.0 (2.0-3.0), being hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) the most frequently used (94.5%). Fifty-two patients were treated with IV cyclophosphamide with a median of 6 bolus received. At the time of BLM start, 443 patients were on prednisone with a median dose of 6.2 mg (5.0-10.0). Significant decreases in prednisone dose, SLEDAI and anti-DNA antibodies were observed from baseline until the last visit, whereas complement C3 and C4 values raised (Figure 1). A total of 118 patients (27.4%) had renal involvement with a median proteinuria of 1.0 g/day (0.5-2.4). Renal biopsy was done in 102 out of 118 patients, being class IV (33%), class III (21%) and class V (16%) the most frequently reported. After BLM, 73.3% of these patients improved (median proteinuria of 0.2 g/day (0.1-0.7).In period1, 100 patients started BLM compared to 362 in period2. The median time from SLE diagnosis to BLM begin was 7.1 (4.0-13.7) and 6.2 (2.1 -14.4) years in period1 and period2, respectively (p=0.454). We found a trend to use more csDMARD before BLM treatment in period1: 2.5 (2-3) vs. 2 (2-3) (p=0.088).A total of 143 (30.5%) patients discontinued treatment mostly due to inefficacy (55.9%) and infections (11.9%). In fact, 116 patients developed infections, mostly mild;2 patients died, 16 had COVID-19 and 4 patients developed tumors requiring discontinuation of the drug.ConclusionIn our cohort of SLE patients in a real-world setting, BLM has been effective, safe and seems to be a good choice to treat renal involvement.References[1]Navarra SV, Guzmán RM, Gallacher AE, et al. Lancet. 2011;377(9767):721-31.[2]Stohl W, Hiepe;rt al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2328-37.[3]Furie R, Rovin BH, Houssiau F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(12):1117-1128.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundVaccine-induced immunity is very important for controlling the COVID-19 infection. The vaccination supports humoral and cellular immunity, and this is one of the main strategy for us. Various vaccines approved in the countries have been shown to reduce infection rates, severity, and mortality.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous or heterologous vaccination among patients with aiRMDs at their third vaccination with BNT162b2 or with two vaccinations followed by COVID-19 infection. We detected the anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody levels and measured the SARS-CoV-2 reactive B-, or T-cell mediated immunity in aiRMDs receiving homologous (Hom.), heterologous (Het.) vaccines or became infected (Inf.).MethodsA single center observational study evaluated immunogenicity and safety of the third dose vaccines or after two-dose regimen of vaccine and COVID infection in patients with aiRMDs. Neutralizing anti-RBD antibodies and specific T-cell response were measured.ResultsWe showed that following 4 months of the booster vaccination with the third dose of mRNA-based vaccine or after COVID infection, the positive (>21.8 BAU/mL) neutralizing anti-RBD IgG antibody response was outstanding in all three patient groups, 95.5%, 100% and 100% of the homologous and heterologous as well as the SARS-CoV-2 infected groups. Taken together booster vaccinations or SARS-CoV-2 infection after completing 2 doses of the vaccination can lead to the production of neutralizing antibodies still protective in RMD cases after 4 months of the third antigen exposition. The booster vaccination reduces the frequency of hospital admissions and mortality with ai RMDs. The vaccinations are effective independently from the type of vaccine, the SARS-CoV-2 specific memory B-cell populations showed a statistically not significant but lower frequency in the infection group. Clinical activity of aiRMDs was not increased following booster vaccination.ConclusionPatients, who received a heterologous booster vaccine had a higher level of peripheral memory B-cells compared to those who had COVID-19 infection. Biologic therapy decreased the level of B-cells. Patients with a disease duration of more than 10 years had higher level of CD8+TNF-α+ and CD8+IFN-γ+ T-cells compared to patients who were diagnosed less than 10 years ago. The third booster mRNA-based vaccine was as much effective as in the homologous and heterologous patients groups compared who had COVID infection.References[1] Szebeni, G.J.;Gemes, N.;Honfi, D.;Szabo, E.;Neuperger, P.;Balog, J.A.;Nagy, L.I.;Szekanecz, Z.;Puskas, L.G.;Toldi, G.;et al. Humoral and Cellular Immunogenicity and Safety of Five Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases in Remission or With Low Disease Activity and in Healthy Controls: A Single Center Study. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 846248.[2]Honfi, D.;Gémes, N.;Szabó, E.;Neuperger, P.;Balog, J.Á.;Nagy, L.I.;Toldi, G.;Puskás, L.G.;Szebeni, G.J.;Balog, A. Comparison of Homologous and Heterologous Booster SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Autoimmune Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11411Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundComplete peripheral B cell depletion has been considered as a relevant indicator of short-term response to rituximab (RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [1,2]. However, no information is available to validate this observation in RA patients long-term treated with RTX.ObjectivesTo determine whether sustained complete B cell (BC) depletion is associated with a better clinical response in RA patients long-term treated with RTX.MethodsRetrospective routine care study conducted in the Rheumatology department of Cochin hospital. We included consecutive patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA hospitalized in 2021 for a new RTX infusion. All recruited patients had received at least 3 prior RTX infusions and had disease activity assessment (DAS28 and DAS28-CRP) and CD19 counts (Aquios, Beckman Coulter) available during each of the 4 last infusion visits. The primary endpoint was the course of DAS28 and DAS28-CRP, calculated the day of the last 4 infusion visits according to sustained complete (mean CD19 counts <18/µL) or incomplete (mean CD19 counts ≥18/µL) BC depletion. Secondary endpoints were the frequency of end-of-dose effect and patient self-reported RA flares at each infusion visit, as well as the course of pain/fatigue VAS, CRP and gammaglobulin levels according to complete or incomplete B cell depletion.ResultsWe included 126 patients (105 women, 83%) with a mean age of 64±12 years and a mean disease duration of 22± 5 years. Only 43 patients (34%) had maintained complete BC depletion during the last 4 infusions (mean CD19 counts 13±4/µL) (Figure 1A-B). Patients with incomplete BC depletion (n=83, mean CD19 counts: 77±73/µL, p<0.001) did not differ from those who maintained complete BC depletion in terms of age, gender, disease duration, structural damages and concomitant treatment.Patients with incomplete BC depletion had a higher frequency of rheumatoid factor (92% vs. 77%, p=0.018) and ACPA (84% vs. 72%, p=0.11);these patients had received RTX for a longer period (99±57 months vs. 69±47 months, p=0.003), with significantly higher number of infusions (14±7 vs. 12±6 infusions, p=0.037) and increased cumulative dose (10±6 g vs. 8±5 g, p=0.10) compared to patients with sustained complete BC depletion. On the other hand, their interval between 2 infusions was significantly longer (8±3 months vs. 6±1 months, p<0.001).The course of DAS28 and DAS28-CRP during the last 4 infusions was not different between the 2 groups (Figures 1C-D). The mean DAS28 and DAS28-CRP calculated at the time of last 4 infusion visits did not differ between patients with incomplete or sustained complete BC depletion (DAS28: 2.71±1.06 vs. 3.01±1.10, p=0.33 and DAS28-CRP: 2.53±0.88 vs. 2.88±0.84, p=0.095). The frequency of an end-of-dose effect and self-reported flares was similar between the 2 groups, as well as the evaluation of pain VAS, asthenia VAS, CRP and gammaglobulin levels (Figures 1E-H).ConclusionMaintaining complete BC depletion is not a therapeutic target to achieve in RA patients in long-term maintenance therapy with RTX. These results show that it is possible to space out RTX infusions to 8 months without loss of clinical benefit, which remains identical to that of patients treated every 6 months with sustained BC depletion. This result may have clinical implications during the COVID-19 pandemic since the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is preferentially obtained in patients with detectable B cells [3].References[1]Vital EM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:603–8.[2]Dass S et al. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58(10):2993–2999.[3]Avouac et al, Rheumatology 2022Figure 1.Course of mean (±SD) CD19, DAS28, DAS28-CRP, pain and fatigue VAS, CRP and gammaglobulins at the last 4 RTX infusion visits according to sustained complete or incomplete B cell depletion (CBCD and IBCD respectively).[Figure omitted. See PDF]Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundTreatment with Rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) has presented a challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, as RTX leads to markedly reduced and often undetectable antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination (1).ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of COVID-19 mRNA revaccination (two doses) on the antibody response in patients with RD who were initial vaccine non-responders. Further, to examine if B-cell levels or T-cell responses before revaccination predicted seroconversion.MethodsFrom a RD cohort (COPANARD) vaccinated with the standard two-dose COVID-19 vaccinations, we enrolled cases without detectable antibody responses (n=17) and controls with detectable antibody response (n=29). Blood donors (n=32) were included as additional controls. Samples were collected before and six weeks after completed revaccination. Total antibodies (abs) and specific IgG, IgA, and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing abs, and SARS-CoV-2 reacting CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were measured before and after revaccination. B-cells (CD19+CD45+) were quantified before revaccination. This study was funded by the Danish Rheumatism Association.ResultsPatient demographics are given in Table 1. Forty-seven percent of cases had detectable total SARS-CoV-2 abs and neutralizing abs after revaccination. However, antibody levels were significantly lower than in controls and blood donors (p<0.008), Figure 1A+B. Revaccination induced an antibody class switch in cases with a decrease in detectable IgM abs (Baseline 11/17, Followup 3/17) and increase in IgG. No significant difference was observed in T-cell responses before and after revaccination between the three groups, Figure 1C. The proportion of cases with detectable CD4+ T cells increased from 69% to 88% (p=0.25), and for CD8+ T cells, the proportion decreased from 88% to 82% (p=1.00). Only 29% of cases had measurable B-cells compared to 100% of controls and blood donors, Figure 1D. Fifty percent of revaccinated cases who seroconverted had measurable B-cells before revaccination, Figure 1D.Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze if active RTX treatment, the presence of B-cells, or a positive T-cell response prior to revaccination predicted seroconversion of total SARS-CoV-2-abs in the patient cohort. We did not find a significant explanatory effect of either variable in the univariate logistic models, data not shown.Table 1.DemographicsCases Revaccination, n=17Controls Boost, n=29Female sex, no(%)1482%2172%Age, median (IQR)6549 - 706762 - 72Disease duration, years1510 - 18229 - 31Rheumatoid Arthritis/SLE13/410/19None DMARD529%828%Prednisone424%13%Methotrexate741%1241%Hydroxychloroquine212%414%None biologic treatment424%931%Rituximab1271%0TNF-inhibitors16%724%JAK-inhibitors0621%IL-6-inhibitors, Abatacept, Benlysta0724%Previous rituximab treatmentAny rituximab treatment1694%13%RTX within the last 15 months, no1488%0Cumulative total dose, mg134-242Time from RTX to revaccination, months95-1249Figure 1.ConclusionIn conclusion, forty-seven percent of initial non-responders were able to seroconvert after two-dose revaccination. However, plasma concentrations of the antibodies against SARS-COV-2 and the levels of neutralizing capacity remained significantly lower than in immunocompetent blood donors. B-cell levels or T-cell responses before revaccination did not predict seroconversion. Our study suggests that patients with RDs who did not mount a detectable serological response to a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have a T cell response similar to immunocompetent controls. Future studies should establish the antibody levels that identify RD patients without sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.References[1]Troldborg A, et al. Time Since Rituximab Treatment Is Essential for Developing a Humoral Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases. J Rheumatol. 2022.AcknowledgementsThe Danish Rheumatism Association [grant number R203-A7217]. We acknowledge all patients and blood donors contributing to the stud for their invaluable participation. The authors would like to thank Sif Kaas Nielsen and Mads Engelhardt Knudsen, the Laboratory of Molecular Medicine at Rigshospitalet, for their excellent technical assistance in analyzing the samples.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
When a pathogen activates B cells and T cells, memory B cells and memory T cells form, and the major immune response happens as a result. These memory cells "remember" every unique pathogen an animal encounters over the course of its lifetime and can develop a potent secondary response if the pathogen is discovered again. Due to the immune system's proactive self-preparation, this sort of immunity is both active and adaptable. The innate immune system and both the cell-mediated and humoral components of immunity are frequently involved in active immunity. Here, Maiorino discusses the naturally and artificially acquired active immunity.
ABSTRACT
The lumpy skin disease (LSD) virus of the Poxviridae family is a serious threat that mostly affects cattle and causes significant economic loss. LSD has the potential to spread widely and its rapidly across borders. Despite the availability of information, there is still no competitive vaccine available for LSD. Therefore, the current study was conducted to develop an epitope-based LSD vaccine that is efficient, secure, and biocompatible and stimulates both innate and adaptive immune responses using immunoinformatics techniques. Initially, putative virion core proteins were manipulated;B-cell and T-cell epitopes have been predicted and connected with the help of adjuvants and linkers. Numerous bioinformatics methods, including antigenicity testing, transmembrane topology screening, allergenicity assessment, conservancy analysis, and toxicity evaluation, were employed to find superior epitopes. Based on promising vaccine candidates and immunogenic potential, the vaccine design was selected. Strong interactions between TLR4 and TLR9 and the anticipated vaccine design were revealed by molecular docking. Finally, based on the high docking score, computer simulations were performed in order to assess the stability, efficacy, and compactness of the constructed vaccine. The simulation outcomes showed that the polypeptide vaccine design was remarkably stable, with high expression, stability, immunogenic qualities, and considerable solubility. Additionally, computer-based research shows that the constructed vaccine provides adequate population coverage, making it a promising candidate for use in the design of vaccines against other viruses within the Poxviridae family and potentially other virus families as well. These outcomes suggest that the epitope-based vaccine developed in this study will be a significant candidate against LSD to control and prevent LSDV-related disorders if further investigated experimentally.
ABSTRACT
An unusual pneumonia infection, named COVID-19, was reported on December 2019 in China. It was reported to be caused by a novel coronavirus which has infected approximately 220 million people worldwide with a death toll of 4.5 million as of September 2021. This study is focused on finding potential vaccine candidates and designing an in-silico subunit multi-epitope vaccine candidates using a unique computational pipeline, integrating reverse vaccinology, molecular docking and simulation methods. A protein named spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 with the GenBank ID QHD43416.1 was shortlisted as a potential vaccine candidate and was examined for presence of B-cell and T-cell epitopes. We also investigated antigenicity and interaction with distinct polymorphic alleles of the epitopes. High ranking epitopes such as DLCFTNVY (B cell epitope), KIADYNKL (MHC Class-I) and VKNKCVNFN (MHC class-II) were shortlisted for subsequent analysis. Digestion analysis verified the safety and stability of the shortlisted peptides. Docking study reported a strong binding of proposed peptides with HLA-A*02 and HLA-B7 alleles. We used standard methods to construct vaccine model and this construct was evaluated further for its antigenicity, physicochemical properties, 2D and 3D structure prediction and validation. Further, molecular docking followed by molecular dynamics simulation was performed to evaluate the binding affinity and stability of TLR-4 and vaccine complex. Finally, the vaccine construct was reverse transcribed and adapted for E. coli strain K 12 prior to the insertion within the pET-28-a (+) vector for determining translational and microbial expression followed by conservancy analysis. Also, six multi-epitope subunit vaccines were constructed using different strategies containing immunogenic epitopes, appropriate adjuvants and linker sequences. We propose that our vaccine constructs can be used for downstream investigations using in-vitro and in-vivo studies to design effective and safe vaccine against different strains of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 specific memory B cells can be maintained at least a year after exposure. However, reports show an altered B cell response during infection in severe COVID-19 cases. This study aims to describe the B cell response during COVID-19 convalescence with a focus on signatures that contribute to durable and robust immunity. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our study cohort consisted of individuals who had recovered from non-severe (hospitalized) or severe (hospitalized and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation) COVID-19. In our comparative analysis, samples from both groups were carefully matched to fall within 4-5 weeks post-symptom onset. We also performed a longitudinal analysis of non-severe patients with sampling ending 5 months post-symptom onset. Using high parameter flow cytometry, we characterized the phenotype of memory B cells using 19 distinct cell markers and fluorescently labeled probes to identify B cells reactive with SARS-CoV-2 spike and receptor-binding domain protein. Additionally, serum collected from individuals was used to quantify antibody titers. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The frequency of spike-specific B cells and serum antibody titers were similar between severe and non-severe groups. However, we observed that individuals recovered from severe COVID-19 have a significantly reduced frequency of spike specific IgG+ memory B cells expressing Tbet and FcRL5 (markers associated with long lived immunity). In the non-severe patients, we observed IgG+Tbet+ B cells targeting the spike protein peak at 2-3 weeks post-symptom onset, decrease by almost fifty percent 4-5 weeks post-symptom onset, and return to baseline 5 months post-symptom onset. Our study also validated previous findings of a short-lived primary response of IgM+ B cells targeting the spike protein. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings highlight potential implications for long-term immunity against re-infection or severity of the resulting disease in patients with severe COVID-19. Further investigation will be necessary to determine whether the maintenance of immunological protection is hindered in patients who overcame severe COVID-19.